0120161068 (Mar. This means a settlement from the EEOC or business is not accepted and the victim decides to take the matter to court. A 75 percent reduction of attorney's fees was unwarranted where Complainant's unsuccessful claims were not distinctly different from his successful claims. The complainant worked at the United States Postal Service (USPS). 520-2008-00053X; Agency Case No. I have plenty to say, but will hold my peace as it is very disturbing of what the Postal Service did not only to me, but to all Rehab or Injured employees at Van Nuys District. EEOC regulations specify the procedures to follow if either party comes to believe the settlement agreement has been breached. 0120182523 (July 7, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2020_08_11/0120182523.pdf. Margaret M. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal No. The Agency, which first denied Complainant's request for an ergonomically correct chair and then provided her with a chair that did not fit her needs, denied Complainant a reasonable accommodation; the Agency should have worked with Complainant to conduct an individualized ergonomic assessment that would have determined her specific needs. Frequently Asked Questions, Commissioner Charges and Directed Investigations, Office of Civil Rights, Diversity and Inclusion, Management Directives & Federal Sector Guidance, Federal Sector Alternative Dispute Resolution, Selected Noteworthy Federal Sector Appellate Decisions. Complainant did not establish an Equal Pay Act violation where he and his female comparator performed substantially different jobs in two different locations, they were supervised under different management chains, the female comparator used more complex technology, and she had been paid at a higher level prior to receiving a lateral transfer. The Administrative Judge properly awarded Complainant $3,000.00 in nonpecuniary compensatory damages where Complainant offered corroborative testimony from his family, friends, and colleagues; the AJ found that Complainant's testimony was not credible in some respects but was credible with respect to how the discrimination affected his family and work life; and the amount awarded was consistent with amounts awarded under similar circumstances.
According to the nonprofit organization ProPublica the EEOC ruled that the NRP illegally discriminated against injured workers by creating a hostile work environment, taking away disability accommodations and revealing workers confidential medical information in 2015 and 2017. Agency discriminated against Complainant on the basis of disability when his managers did not allow him to take a polygraph examination, which was required for his position, where there was no reason to believe that his multiple sclerosis and medication would affect the validity of the polygraph result. Barbara S. v. U.S. 0120180570, 0120181692, and 2019002121 (Sept. 4, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120180570.pdf. 20, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120160256.txt. Plains and Copperhead Pipeline Companies Reach Settlement with EEOC for $1.75 Million U.S. Agency cannot shift the blame for challenged actions onto an alleged responsible management official and then make no effort to explain why the official did not respond to EEO Investigator's request for an affidavit or to provide other explanations for the official's alleged actions; an agency's legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason(s) must be detailed and supported by the evidence. LockA locked padlock The Agency provided insufficient evidence to support its dismissal of a complaint, on the basis that Complainant was not an Agency employee, where the record that the Agency submitted contained only the EEO Counselor's Report, the Notice of Right to File a Discrimination Complaint, and the formal complaint; the Agency did not provide any contracts or affidavits from management officials regarding the day-to-day responsibilities and management of Complainant's position. endstream
endobj
startxref
Agency discriminated against Complainant based on sex when it gave her a light-duty assignment that changed her starting time but allowed four male comparators who performed light-duty work to retain their normal starting times; Complainant and the comparators were substantially similar in all relevant aspects: they were Mail Handlers who worked on the same tour at the same facility and reported to the same supervisor. Jenna P. v. Dep't of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. man who worked for them at the Ionia Post Office. 529 0 obj
<>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<1FB7EE72CCD9854B90DCFC8A33497EB8><1B534663FC186A42AEFC8BA0152CE4CF>]/Index[511 26]/Info 510 0 R/Length 94/Prev 400457/Root 512 0 R/Size 537/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream
It remains to be seen whether the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in 2020 that discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity is prohibited sex discrimination will have an impact on total LGBTQ-based sex discrimination charges filed.. Mail sorters must routinely squat and lift heavy bins of mail over 70 pounds, which can cause knee, back and rotator cuff injuries. 0120171387 (May 2, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120171387.pdf. Watch David Norths remarks commemorating 25 years of the World Socialist Web Site and donate today. Buck S. v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. Of the agencies completing 25 or more investigations, the Tennessee Valley Authority had the lowest average of 100 days. 0120182156 (Sept. 12, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120182156.txt. Cox claims upon returning to work she was subjected to a continuing and ongoing hostile work environment by Supervisor Freeman and Postmaster McQuiston. Lara G. v Postmaster General, EEOC Req. The final ruling from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission came more than 10 years after a former employee first filed a class complaint alleging USPS subjected employees to a "pattern. 0120182764 (June 23, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_08_31/0120182764.pdf. The parties ultimately agreed on a $49.9 million settlement for these violations and the first round of payments was accomplished beginning in June of 2020. According to the USPS' own written policy, "managers and supervisors are responsible for preventing harassment and inappropriate behavior could lead to illegal harassment and must respond. Malinda F. v. Dep't of the Air Force, EEOC Appeal No. No. Complainant established a prima facie case of age discrimination, and Agency did not meet its burden of production to articulate a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for not selecting Complainant for a supervisory position; stating that a complainant was not selected because she received a lower score than the selectees does not meet an agencys burden of production, unless the agency explains the specific reasoning for the score. Rick G. v. Dep't of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. Bart M. v. Dep't of the Interior, EEOC Appeal No. 26, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120172637.pdf. Brendon L. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal No. Class members should expect to receive written notice concerning the claim procedure within the next month. Harriet M. v. Dep't of Defense, EEOC Appeal No. Jordon S. v. Dep't of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. Removing Complainant from the workplace by placing her on administrative leave did not insulate the Agency from liability for sexual harassment; reassigning the person targeted for harassment is not appropriate corrective action. Agency discriminated against Complainant on the basis of national origin when her supervisor prohibited her from interacting with a contractor on the ground that she had a language barrier with the contractor; Agency did not identify any specific communications that the contractor could not understand or any specific problems with Complainant's language skills, and there was no evidence that anyone could not understand Complainant. After an appeal, complainant later requested the EEOC reopen her case. Merit resolutions refers to charges that are resolved in the agency's administrative process (pre-litigation) in favor of the individual who filed the charge. In January 2016, the Postal Service paid $40.2 million to employees; however, it subsequently notified the APWU of errors in these initial payments. 0120170498 (Apr. Foster B. v. Dep't of Health and Human Services, EEOC Appeal No. Agency did not meet its burden to show that the disparity between Complainant's pay and that of two male general surgeons was based on a factor other than sex where Agency provided only vague statements to justify the pay differential and there was a lack of information reflecting how the salaries of Complainant and the comparators were set. USPS agreed to pay $840,044 for 4,584 pre-complaint settlements, of which 433 were monetary settlements averaging $1,940. 0120090062 (9/21/10). 0120162314 (June 5, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120162314.txt. Just 47% of initial appeals before the Merit Systems Protection Boardthe quasi-judicial agency tasked with ensuring agencies follow civil service laws in their disciplinary actions and other . Ross R. v. Dept of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No.
I know I use to be a Union Steward for National Association of Letter Carriers for seven years. Agency did not show that employment of Complainant in Deportation Officer position would pose a direct threat where Medical Review Board made a blanket determination that Complainants medication created a potential risk of injury while performing Deportation Officers duties, but the Board ignored his work history in a similarly strenuous law enforcement position and discounted the opinion of his cardiologist. 1-800-669-6820 (TTY)
536 0 obj
<>stream
For Deaf/Hard of Hearing callers:
Thersa E. v. U.S. (This article first appeared in the January/February 2021 issue of the American Postal Worker magazine) On December 1, 2020, Arbitrator Sharnoff issued a decision confirming Clerk Craft jurisdiction over operation of the Small Parcel Sorting System. 0120161608 (July 17, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120161608.txt. She alleged the USPS had not complied with the EEOC order. Before such hearing was held, plaintiff Case 1:03-cv-01987-EGS Document 25 Filed 09/28/05 Page 1 of 19 Irvin M. v. Dep't of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. The Agency discriminated against Complainant based on his disability when it failed to provide him with a reasonable accommodation in a timely manner and when it delayed his promotion. The four unions which officially represent the postal workersthe American Postal Workers Union, National Association of Letter Carriers, National Postal Mail Handlers Union and National Rural Letter Carriers Associationhave not lifted a finger to mobilize workers to oppose these attacks, including the loss of over 250,000 post office jobs since 1999an almost 28 percent reduction in its workforce. Washington, DC 20507
The majority of cases, about 67 percent, are ruled in the plaintiff's favor when taken to litigation. Republican President Donald Trump has unleashed new threats to privatize the USPS in recent years, against which thousands of postal workers in cities across the US protested in 2018. 0120182601 (Nov. 8, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120182601.pdf. Alena C. v. Dep't of State, EEOC Appeal No. Administrative Judge properly sanctioned Complainant, by cancelling the hearing and remanding the complaint to the Agency for a final decision, when Complainant failed to abide by the AJ's order to remove video depositions of management officials from YouTube and to provide written confirmation that he had done so. Jess P. v. Dep't of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. Substantial evidence supported Administrative Judge's finding that Agency discriminated against Complainant on the bases of race (African American) and sex (male) when it terminated his employment for alleged insubordination and misconduct; AJ found that evidence substantiated Complainant's perception that supervisor regarded him as a "big, Black man" and racially stereotyped his behavior as aggressive and intimidating. 48-1 40-0062-06, the final agency decision (FAD) issued in connection Alline B. v. Social Security Administration, EEOC Appeal No. 0720160006 and 0720160007 (Sept. 25, 2017), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0720160006.0720160007.txt. Cox filed another EEO complaint of discrimination which is still pending. The EEOC has tremendous flexibility when deciding whether to sue an employer or accept an employer's offer to settle. LockA locked padlock 0120151790 (Jan. 11, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120151790.pdf. International Committee of the Fourth International. Lois G. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal No. Agency denied Complainant a reasonable accommodation in violation of the Rehabilitation Act when it failed to provide him with a sign-language interpreter at the kick-off Combined Federal Campaign meeting intended for all facility employees; a "make-up" meeting, where only the CFC representative and three deaf employees, but no keynote speakers, were present was insufficient to remedy the situation. In 2020, amid monthslong . A lock ( Lauralee C. v. Dep't of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. Amina W. v. Dep't of the Treasury, EEOC Appeal Nos. Annalee D. v. General Services Administration, EEOC Request No. Login to EEO efile This is the on-line system for initiating the Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) counseling process or the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) process with an EEO Counselor to resolve your claim of employment discrimination. The more inherently degrading or humiliating the defendants action is, the more reasonable to infer that a person would suffer humiliation or distress from that action. Alesia P. v. Dep't of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. 1995)("comparability of awards must be adjusted for the changing value of money over at Our goal is to get this matter resolved in a fair way as quickly as possible. 2019001284 (Aug. 4, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2020_12_07/2019001284.pdf. On December 8, 2017, Arbitrator Shyam Das found that the Postal Service was in violation of the parties Article 1.6.B Global Settlement Remedy (This article first appeared in the July/August 2021 issue of the American Postal Worker magazine) She further alleged the USPS retaliated against her for prior EEO action from 2005-2006. 0120162182 (Dec. 8, 2017), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120162182.txt. An official website of the United States government. All workers here quit, retired, or were fired. No violation of Equal Pay Act where Agency established that the Agency-wide salary increases and the performance-based salary increase system were gender-neutral factors, were applied consistently, and explain any compensation disparity between Complainant and her male coworkers. If you are a federal employee or a USPS employee, you can set a consultation via our website at: http://www.theangellawfirm.com You can get a free consultation (15 minutes) or paid consultation for upto a full one hour. Please know that we are fighting for you, just as we have done for over 10 years. 0120090062 (9/21/10). Wilfredo M. v. Dep't of Treasury, EEOC Appeal No. 2020005108 (Apr. Sang G. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal No. 1-844-234-5122 (ASL Video Phone)
Colby S. v. Dep't of the Treasury, EEOC Appeal No. Cristen T. v. U.S. Official websites use .gov If you agree to settle a complaint based on one or more stipulations, these must be written down, agreed on, and signed both by you and a management designee. Update: McConnell vs USPS NRP EEOC Class Action Lawsuit Posted on December 14, 2020 by postal A class action complaint for injured on duty postal employees was certified by an EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ) on May 30,2008. 0120122672 (Feb. 24, 2017), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120122672.txt. death spawn osrs. usps eeoc settlements 2020 usps eeoc settlements 2020. ps4 controller trigger keeps activating. Agency's final order adopting Administrative Judge's decision vacated, and case remanded to Agency for reissuance of final order, where Complainant did not receive the AJ's decision and therefore was unable to argue with specificity about the AJ's findings and conclusions that the Agency implemented. 24, 2017), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120132211.txt. but I was working at a Post office in the same county in 2015. In 2021, we reported that non-career employees' turnover and injury rates were higher than career rates, both before and after we controlled for numerous factors such as employee tenure. Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. The Postal Service and Postal Inspection Service appropriately addressed all workplace violence cases in the six selected districts reviewed. Zonia C. v. Dep't of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. 24, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120162040.txt. Agency violated the Rehabilitation Act when it placed Complainant's private medical documents in his Employee Work Folder, a non-medical work file. We wanted to reach out and give a quick update on the case, and answer some questions that have been raised. After an appeal, complainant later requested the EEOC reopen her case. Marquis K. v. Dep't of the Navy, EEOC Appeal No. 0120171405 (Mar. 2021001733 (June 2, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_08_31/2021001733.pdf. 0120170676 (Oct. 31, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120170676.pdf. Serita B. v. Dep't of the Army, EEOC Appeal No. Pay differential was based on a factor other than sex where male comparator was hired one year after complainants were hired, a different management official evaluated his application under different circumstances, and the different grade classifications were due to a difference in professional judgment by the evaluating officials. Agency, which provided no explanation for the more-than-one-year delay in its issuance of the final decision, was ordered to post a notice at its Complaint Adjudication Office regarding its failure to comply with the Commission's regulatory timeframes and orders and to provide training to its EEO personnel. The U.S. Allegations of retaliation by IRS Examiner and Taxpayer Advocate properly dismissed for failure to state a claim where actions at issue occurred to Complainant as a taxpayer, not as a former employee, and allegations constituted a collateral attack on the tax adjudication process. Supervisor's instruction that Complainant and her subordinates not speak Tagalog when discussing work topics was an English-only rule that was not justified by business necessity because there was no evidence that the rule was necessary for the safe or efficient operation of the Agency. It is not an effective accommodation to require an employee with a disability to take leave when another accommodation would enable the employee to continue working, and it is not the agency's role to dictate what type of assistive or monitoring device the employee uses. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently unveiled regulations to modify the presuit conciliation process in hopes of finally settling some employment disputes. The MVS Craft continues to grow. Sharon S. v. Dep't of Defense, EEOC Appeal No. This was met with backlash from the public, and the following year it announced it would instead keep rural post offices open with reduced retail hours, cutting back on labor costs and limiting essential services provided to the millions of people. Robin H. v. Environmental Protection Agency, EEOC Appeal No. The Agency did not overcome Complainant's prima facie case of sex discrimination where the Agency explained the general mechanics of the selection process for a Lead Transportation Security Officer position but did not provide a specific, individualized explanation for why Complainant was not chosen for the position. Applying Bostock v. Clayton County, 140 S. Ct. 1831 (2020), the Commission found that the agency discriminated against complainant on the basis of sexual orientation when it did not select him for any of three supervisory positions; complainant established that the agency's proffered explanation was pretextual. 1300 L Street NW Many noteworthy federal appellate decisions are frequently used as a part of the Commission's outreach and training efforts. A real socialist and internationalist strategy is needed to take control of communications infrastructure from the corporate ruling class and to place it into the hands of the working class worldwide. More in: Issue Briefs. Complainant awarded $75,000 in non-pecuniary compensatory damages where nearly two years of sexual harassment caused embarrassment and humiliation, triggered daily headaches and weekly migraines, and resulted in a diagnosis of anxiety. Agency dismissal of complaint for failure to state a claim, on ground that Commission did not have jurisdiction to review substance of security clearance, reversed where agency made a determination based on suitability, not a security clearance. Statements from others, including family members, friends, health care providers, other counselors (including clergy) could address the outward manifestations or physical consequences of emotional distress including sleeplessness, anxiety, stress, depression, marital strain, humiliation, emotional distress, loss of self-esteem, excessive fatigue or a nervous breakdown. The Agency did not make a good-faith effort to accommodate Complainant's request not to work on Sundays where supervisor did not explore any type of accommodation and there was no indication whether it would be feasible to ask other employees to volunteer to work on Sundays. May 4, 2020 An EEOC Administrative Judge has approved a settlement in the Pittman v. USPS Class Complaint in which the complaint alleged discrimination based on disability against a class of employees in permanent rehabilitation positions, on a nation-wide basis. I am a member of this class action. hb```,,K@( Official websites use .gov Silas T. v. Dep't of the Air Force, EEOC Appeal No. 0120181844 (Sept. 10, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120181844.pdf. Welcome to the USPS Class Action Claim Website This website is intended for the sole use of claimants and their attorneys/representatives in the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission class action involving the NRP and allegations of discrimination (Velva B, et al. Pamela W. v. Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency, EEOC Appeal No. v. United States Postal Service anAJ decision certified the following class: All permanent rehabilitation employees and limited duty employees at the U.S. 1-844-234-5122 (ASL Video Phone)
Assuming that Complainant established that he was subjected to sexual harassment because of his sex/sexual orientation, the decision found that the Agency was not liable for the alleged harassment because management began an investigation immediately after Complainant reported a coworker's comments, an EEO Counselor spoke to employees about EEO guidelines at a meeting, a Power Point on sexual harassment was presented at a group meeting, an Agency official spoke to the group about the matter, the union president was made available for counseling, the coworker received a letter of reprimand regarding her comments, and there was no evidence that the coworker made any comments about Complainant's sexual orientation after he reported the matter to management. Lacy R. v. Dep't of the Air Force, EEOC Appeal No. 3, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120180137.pdf. Washington, DC 20507
This resulted in an award of $15,000 in non-pecuniary damages as the agency claimed that Padilla had not experienced any long-term mental or physical illness nor any emotional harm. The same year, several media outlets began to speculate that the USPS was going out of business. 0120123215 and 0120131079 (Mar. The claims, evidence, and legal briefs for all of our clients relief claims have been submitted to the EEOC Administrative Judge. 0120161017 (May 29, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120161017.txt. Neither did the unions make any effort to unite USPS workers with their class brothers and sisters across the border during the 2018 strike of 50,000 Canadian postal workers, who were also fighting against a brutal profit-driven work regimen where real wages had fallen and understaffing led to speedup and heavy workloads that caused an accident rate among postal workers to be five times that of the average rate for federally regulated industries. Agency did not establish that its "sit and reach" requirement for a Wildlife Refuge Specialist position was job related and consistent with business necessity where no Agency witness was able to articulate how the ability to reach over one's toes while sitting down with legs outstretched was related to any of the functions of the position. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a lawsuitthat Eclipse Advantage, Inc., violated federal law by subjecting an African-American employee to racial discrimination and retaliation at its Aldi Food Service warehouse in Hinckley, Ohio. 0720180014 (May 10, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0720180014.pdf. 0120171750 (Feb. 28, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120171750.pdf. Padilla v. USPS, EEOC Appeal No. And the Unions are bed partners with Management. Agency failed to take prompt and effective action to address Complainant's claim of sexual harassment; a supervisor's fear of retaliation by his or her superior is an insufficient argument for failing to take action as a supervisor. information only on official, secure websites. This booklet also provides an explanation of the REDRESS program REDRESS, an alternative dispute resolution process, may offer you an opportunity to request mediation in addition to traditional EEO