Deciding when or whether you should write a rebuttal, determining what steps you should take next if you choose the . Authors often ask for a new referee to be consulted, particularly in cases where two referees have been used and one is negative, the other positive. Register for comprehensive research tips and expert advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a lot more. Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. How do I get published in Nature or Science? Can airtags be tracked from an iMac desktop, with no iPhone? Such figures can be particularly helpful to nonspecialist readers of cell, molecular and structural biology papers. I am currently continuing at SunAgri as an R&D engineer. . However, the final decision may not be only that of an acceptance or a rejection. Improve this answer. Sometimes, the decision for the editor is really easy and quick and sometimes rather difficult and time-consuming. Hopefully, the exact situation will become clear with the next status update. Space in Nature is extremely limited, and so format requirements must be strictly observed, as advised by the editor handling the submission, and detailed in the manuscript formatting guide. If the authors feel that they have a strong scientific case for reconsideration (if the referees have missed the point of the paper, for example) they can appeal the decision in writing. Journals vary in their attitude toward such trade-offs, for example in deciding whether to publish a paper that proposes an important new idea based on data that are less than solid. As opposed to an editor, a peer reviewer advises the researcher of how he would have conducted his research, and what research methods would have made a difference. If a paper was considered insufficiently novel or interesting to merit high-profile publication, we are unlikely to reconsider simply because the authors disagree. The criteria for a paper to be sent for peer-review are that the results seem novel, arresting (illuminating, unexpected or surprising), and that the work described has both immediate and far-reaching implications. Many journals now rely on editorial management systems, which are supposed to support the administration and decision making of editors, while aiming at making the process of communication faster and more transparent to both reviewers and authors. Although we hope that the peer review files will provide a detailed and useful view into our peer review process, it is important to note that these files will not contain all the information considered in the editorial decision making process, such as the discussions between editors, editorial decision letters, or any confidential comments made by reviewers or authors to the editors. Short answer: the editor will continue to try and find other suitable reviewers, sending them invitations and waiting for replies. Although optional, the cover letter is an excellent opportunity to briefly discuss the importance of the submitted work and why it is appropriate for the journal. This will reduce delays. In a competitive world, as Gore Vidal put it, It is not enough to succeed. In addition, most authors are genuinely excited about their work, and usually submit to Nature Neuroscience because they believe that the paper deserves high-profile publication. Sometimes they are more busy. Authors are usually informed within a week if the paper is not being considered. Asked by megha m However, if it has not gone through peer review, but is directly showing the status awaiting final decision, then there is a possibility that your paper might be rejected after initial screening by the editor. What Is the Difference Between 'Man' And 'Son of Man' in Num 23:19? Editorial processes are described for the following stages: Atsubmission | Aftersubmission | Afteracceptance. Is there a proper earth ground point in this switch box? You said the finals started tomorrow. best firewood for allergies; shannon balenciaga jail; river lathkill postcode Editing and proofreading services for a publication-ready manuscript, Customized service packs to match all publication needs, Expert help for all academic translation needs. In recognition of the time and expertise our reviewers provide toNatures editorial process, we formally acknowledge their contribution to the external peer review of articles published in the journal. Authors should use the formatting guide section to ensure that the level, length and format (particularly the layout of figures and tables and any Supplementary Information) conforms with Nature's requirements, at submission and each revision stage. You could ask how soon they think they will answer, or give a deadline yourself, warning them that, after that deadline without having heard, you will submit the text to another publisher. According to the process described in IEEE Transactions, Awaiting AE recommendation status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AEs decision for acceptance is pending. [CDATA[// > We would suggest that you wait for another 2 weeks before writing to the journal for an update. Decisions by editors are routinely made very rapidly after receipt of reports, and Nature offers an advance online publication (AOP) service to an increasing number of manuscripts. Directly from with editor, to decision under process. !1997 F350 XLT 4x4 Crew Cab (4 door) 7.3 Liter V-8 Diesel Powerstroke, Automatic with overdrive, Dana 60 front axle, Weld Racing Wheels and Toyo Open Country Radials (tires and wheels cost $4500) only 66,000 original miles Located in Seattle Washington 98188 1 mile from Seatac AirportI . Site design / logo 2023 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA.